Share This Article
This is the last of our three “Consumer Reports” articles that will come out in the new year. This one is a review of our Continental Pure Contact products. From the moment you receive your new Continental Pure Contact product, you must take a few minutes to examine the product and see how it performs. There are no quick fixes, no “one-size-fits-all” products.
The first test I did with a Continental Pure Contact was an oil spill test. This was in September. It’s a very real thing, and it’s something that happens every day. Most oil spills are very small and quick. The oil usually falls out in a matter of minutes or hours. The Continental Pure Contact oil spill test was done by a company called MESSA, and it was a very well executed and thorough test. I was impressed.
I’m still not sure how good the technology is, but Continental Pure Contact’s oil spill test is a pretty good start in terms of how it works. Its a big improvement from the previous test (which was done in 2014) that ended up not working at all and actually made the oil spill worse. What I find interesting, is that the test was done in a real ocean environment, which makes me think that the technology works better in real environments.
I think the thing that makes me most impressed is the fact that our test was done in a real ocean environment. We were able to actually test the technology on a real ocean. Which is extremely important if you’re doing a test like this. Most of the tests that are done in laboratories don’t really work in the real world.
We were also able to test the technology in a real ocean environment. We also had the opportunity to test the technology in a real hurricane. This is pretty cool. When we took photos of a real hurricane, we were able to compare the storm to how it looked in the lab. Which is pretty cool.
And of course, we had the opportunity to test the technology in an actual real-world hurricane. This was pretty awesome.
I am not a scientist myself, but I do know that the science behind these kinds of tests is actually very similar to how real-world tests are conducted. So we had an opportunity to test the technology against a hurricane, and the results were quite impressive. It seems that the technology has some pretty big advantages over the old water-tight glass containers. The biggest one being the fact that it allows for a closer fit of the liquid spray into the container.
This is a very interesting thing that we’ve been testing out at the lab. It is actually based off of a similar liquid spray invention developed by NASA. The technology allows for a wider spray pattern, but the primary advantage is that it allows for a closer fit of liquid into the container. In fact that is one important reason why it is so effective at getting into a hurricane.
The technology is a little bit more complicated than the other inventions we’ve seen, but it is a pretty nifty little tool. We have been testing it in a variety of hurricane situations and it has been very effective. The larger container that is used in the spray is very helpful because it allows for some nice spray to spread out.
When it comes to the hurricane question, there are three primary methods that weve seen that have worked. One is the use of aerosol spray. This works because the aerosol spray is able to get into some large areas that a normal spray cannot reach. The second method, the use of a smaller container that can be carried as an accessory, is pretty much ineffective. The third method is the use of a liquid that works at lower pressures than a normal aerosol spray.
